The Home Office insisted it still aims to remove the pair "as soon as possible".
A Judicial Office spokeswoman said: "Applications have been lodged by Kamel Mustafa Mustafa (a.k.a. Abu Hamza) and Khaled al Fawaz seeking injunctions preventing their removal from the UK.
"A High Court judge has considered the applications on the papers and adjourned the cases to a hearing in open court. The judge has issued interim injunctions preventing their removal prior to those hearings. The judge has direct the hearings be fixed urgently."
Hamza, al-Fawaz and three other terror suspects, are expected to be extradited to the United States, where they face terror charges, after the European Court of Human Rights rejected their final appeal bid on Monday.
Hamza, who lost both hands and an eye fighting the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, is charged in the US with 11 counts relating to the taking of 16 hostages in Yemen in 1998, advocating jihad in Afghanistan in 2001 and conspiring to establish a jihad training camp in Bly, Oregon in 2000 2001.
Al-Fawwaz was indicted with Osama bin Laden and 20 others for their alleged involvement in, or support for, the bombing of US embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam in 1998. Al-Fawwaz faces more than 269 counts of murder.
A Home Office spokeswoman said: "The European Court of Human Rights ruled there was no bar to the extradition of these men.
"We will continue working to ensure they are handed over to the US authorities as soon as possible."
Yesterday the BBC had to issue an embarrassing apology after it revealed the Queen s private thoughts over Hamza.
The broadcaster s respected security correspondent, Frank Gardner, revealed on air how the Queen had previously told him of her frustration when Hamza was at liberty and spreading messages of hate.
He said she had raised the issue of why Hamza had not been arrested with a Home Secretary .
The story then led the BBC news channels and websites.
It is not known when the conversation took place but Hamza was eventually arrested on charges under the Terrorism Act in 2004 and later jailed for seven years.
But within hours of Mr Gardner s revelations, the BBC wrote to Buckingham Palace apologising for the wholly inappropriate breach of confidence.
It is a long-standing convention that private conversations with the Queen are never repeated.
Guests are regularly reminded of the protocol before meeting a Royal in a private capacity and at some events, especially involving journalists, cards have even been handed out.
When Mr Gardner made the revelation on BBC Radio 4 s Today programme, presenter James Naughtie described it as a corker .
But in a letter to the Palace, the BBC later wrote: This morning on the Today programme our correspondent Frank Gardner revealed details of a private conversation which took place some years ago with The Queen.
The conversation should have remained private and the BBC and Frank deeply regret this breach of confidence. It was wholly inappropriate.
Frank is extremely sorry for the embarrassment caused and has apologised to the Palace.
The apology was issued after a high-level meeting between senior news executives including Helen Boaden, Director for BBC News Group.
A spokesman insisted the corporation had realised its error and apologised and had not received any formal complaint from the Palace.
However, that was only after it had been the top story in countless news bulletins.
In 2007, the BBC had to apologise to the Queen after edited film footage wrongly implied she had walked out of a portrait session with photographer Annie Leibovitz.
And in 2010, the Palace was said to have a profound sense of disappointment when former Prime Minister Tony Blair revealed some details of his private meetings with the Queen in his memoirs.
Ministers are expected to abide by the same protocol that all private conversations and meeting remain private.
Mr Gardner was discussing the Hamza case yesterday when he revealed that the Queen had previously spoken her frustrations prior to the cleric's arrest.
The cleric had regularly aired anti-British views in the early 2000s from his then base at Finsbury Park mosque in north London.
Mr Gardner said: The Queen was pretty upset that there was no way to arrest him. She couldn t understand surely there must be some law that he broke.
Well, sure enough there was. He was eventually convicted and sentenced to seven years for soliciting murder and racial hatred.
He added: She spoke to the Home Secretary at the time and said, surely this man must have broken some laws, my goodness, why is he still at large?
Because he was conducting these radical activities, he called Britain a lavatory, he was incredibly anti-British, and yet he was sucking up money from this country for a long time. He was a huge embarrassment to Muslims, who condemned him.
Asked how he knew about the Queen s views on Hamza, Mr Gardner said simply: She told me.
Buckingham Palace declined to comment.
David Blunkett, the Home Secretary at the time of Hamza s arrest, said he never discussed the issue with the Queen.
Other former Home Secretaries said it would be inappropriate to discuss any private conversations they had with the Queen.
However, Keith Vaz, chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, said it showed "how deeply concerned" the Queen is for the "welfare of her subjects".
He said: "It's good that she has mentioned this to the home secretary and absolutely appropriate."
But campaign group Republic accused the BBC of revealing details of the Queen's interest in the case to put her "on the right side of public opinion".
No comments:
Post a Comment